What we help resolve

Focused checks designed to support a specific decision—not long, open-ended simulation projects.

Flow & mixing performance

The problem: Mixing, residence time, or distribution determines product quality, and you can't measure it directly at scale.
Why it matters: Poor mixing leads to quality issues, batch failures, or inefficient use of expensive additives.
How analysis helps: Quantify mixing effectiveness, identify dead zones, and compare configurations before committing to hardware.
Decision this supports: Go/no-go on a mixer design or scale-up plan.

Pressure drop & energy losses

The problem: Measured losses are higher than expected, or you need to justify performance across operating ranges without extensive testing.
Why it matters: Undersized equipment, wasted energy, or disputes with customers about guaranteed performance.
How analysis helps: Map pressure losses across geometries and conditions, identify where losses occur, and provide defensible numbers.
Decision this supports: Sizing decisions, warranty claims, or design changes.

Scale-up & validation support

The problem: Moving from pilot to production introduces uncertainty, and internal or external stakeholders need confidence before proceeding.
Why it matters: Delayed projects, expensive physical testing, or approval roadblocks.
How analysis helps: Provide evidence that supports scale-up decisions, identifies risks, and satisfies validation requirements.
Decision this supports: Internal sign-off or regulatory/customer approval.

Transient & complex flows

The problem: Time-dependent behavior, unstable regimes, or unusual operating conditions make the system hard to predict or test.
Why it matters: Unexpected failures, performance variability, or inability to diagnose problems.
How analysis helps: Capture dynamic behavior, identify instability mechanisms, and characterize performance under difficult conditions.
Decision this supports: Root cause identification or design modification.

Targeted multiphysics checks

The problem: Thermal effects, structural interactions, or coupled phenomena can't be ignored, but full-system analysis isn't justified.
Why it matters: Overlooked interactions lead to failures or overly conservative designs.
How analysis helps: Focused checks on specific interactions—thermal gradients, force distributions, coupled effects—without unnecessary scope.
Decision this supports: Verification that a specific interaction is acceptable.

Have a question that fits one of these patterns?

Discuss your situation